unilad
Advert
Advert
Advert
Advert

Scientist Says Loch Ness Monster Might Be Real After ‘Surprising’ DNA Discovery

by : Emily Brown on : 03 Jun 2019 17:03
Loch ness monster researchLoch ness monster researchPA Images/ Wikimedia via Immanuel Giel

After years of people dismissing the Loch Ness monster as nothing more than a myth, scientists have made a discovery which suggests the creature could actually be real. 

Advert

This will of course be excellent news for all those who have spent their lives trying to convince the world the monster really is lurking in the depths of waters in the Scottish Highlands.

I have a feeling there’s going to be a lot of exclamations of ‘I told you so!’ as a result of this revelation, as well as an increase in hunting missions.

Loch Ness monster hunter Steve Feltham will certainly be intrigued:

Advert

The discovery came as a result of a major scientific study of Loch Ness in which researchers travelled the length of the loch and took water samples from three different depths.

According to the Mirror, the scientists collected DNA left behind in the skin, scales, feathers, fur and faeces of creatures at the loch and sent samples to labs in New Zealand, Australia, Denmark, and France to be analysed.

Although the full details of what they found are yet to be released, Professor Neil Gemmell of the University of Otago, New Zealand, described the results as ‘surprising’.

Loch Ness monsterLoch Ness monsterGetty

Gemmell, who is an expert in genomics, ecology, population, conservation and evolutionary biology, hinted one of the four popular theories about the mysterious creature might be correct.

There has been a lot of speculation about Nessie over the years, but popular theories include the monster being a long-necked plesiosauria which survived the period when dinosaurs became extinct, or it not being a monster at all, and actually being a sturgeon or giant catfish living in the loch.

Speaking of the findings, the professor said:

Advert

Is there anything deeply mysterious? Hmm. It depends what you believe. Is there anything startling? There are a few things that are a bit surprising.

What we’ll have achieved is what we set out to do, which is document the biodiversity of Loch Ness in some level of detail.

We’ve tested each one of the main monster hypotheses and three of them we can probably say aren’t right and one of them might be.

Loch Ness MonsterLoch Ness MonsterWikimedia Commons

Admittedly, a ‘surprising’ finding might just be the discovery of an unexpected fish living in the loch or something along those lines, but Gemmell specifically said one of the ‘monster’ hypotheses could be correct, so I think the Nessie believers have reason to get their hopes up.

The professor added he hopes full details of the study will be released this year, so it won’t be long before these ‘surprising’ findings are revealed!

If you have a story you want to tell, send it to [email protected]

Emily Brown

Emily Brown first began delivering important news stories aged just 13, when she launched her career with a paper round. She graduated with a BA Hons in English Language in the Media from Lancaster University, and went on to become a freelance writer and blogger. Emily contributed to The Sunday Times Travel Magazine and Student Problems before becoming a journalist at UNILAD, where she works on breaking news as well as longer form features.

Topics: Animals, Loch Ness, loch ness monster, monster, mystery, mythical creatures, scotland

Credits

Mirror
  1. Mirror

    Loch Ness monster 'might be real' as scientists make 'surprising' discovery